The UEFA Executive Committee has decided the key principles governing
the "EURO for Europe", with the 2020 final tournament to be staged in 13
cities across the continent.
The UEFA EURO 2020 final tournament will be staged in 13 cities across Europe, following a decision taken today by the UEFA Executive Committee at its first meeting of 2013 at the House of European Football in Nyon, Switzerland.
The UEFA Executive Committee, chaired by UEFA President Michel Platini, approved the key event and football principles for the "EURO for Europe", which include:
• The matches will be split into 13 different packages, with 12 ordinary packages including three group matches and one knockout round (round of 16 or quarter-final), and one package for the semi-finals and the final;
• There will only be a maximum of one venue per country, meaning one stadium for each of the available 13 packages. Both semi-finals and the final will be played in one stadium; and
• Each association will be allowed to present up to two bids, one for the ordinary package and one for the semi-finals/final package. Each national association can decide to present the same city for these two bids or two different cities.
Projected stadiums will be admitted in the bidding process, with a deadline set in 2016 for the construction of any new stadium to start, failing which the decision on such a host city could be reviewed.
The required minimum net stadiums capacities should be:
• 70,000 for semi-finals/final;
• 60,000 for quarter-finals;
• 50,000 for round of 16 and group matches; and
• Up to two exceptions would be allowed for stadiums of a net minimum capacity of 30,000 seats, limited to group matches and a round of 16 match.
All teams will participate in the qualifying competition and the 13 countries staging matches will therefore not be automatically qualified.
A maximum of two host teams would be drawn into each of the six final tournament groups, with each qualified host being guaranteed two home matches in the group phase. There would not be any such guarantee for the knockout stages.
For the group stage, the group composition would remain subject to seeding and to a draw. However, the allocation of hosting teams to the groups would also take travel distances into account (for example, and if feasible, flights would not exceed two hours' duration between host cities to allow easy access to travelling fans).
The participating teams will be free to choose where to set up their base camp, without the obligation to stay in one of the host countries.
The timeline for the bidding process has been approved by the UEFA Executive Committee:
• 28 March 2013: Approval of the bidding requirements and bid regulations
• April 2013: Publication of the bid requirements and launch of the bidding phase
• September 2013: Formal confirmation of their bid by the candidates
• April/May 2014: Submission of bid dossiers and start of the evaluation phase
• September 2014: Appointment of the host cities by the UEFA Executive Committee
A video news recording of the UEFA Executive Committee press conference will be made available today on the Eurovision worldfeed service at 20.00CET.
link
Saturday 26 January 2013
Ahly Club Ultras gather to march to massacre trial venue
Ahly Club Ultras (hardcore football fans) are organising on Saturday a mass protest to head to the Police Academy in Cairo's Fifth Compound in conjunction with the court ruling expected to be announced in the Port Said football tragedy of last year.Thousands of al-Masry football club Ultras "Masrawy" and "Green Eagles" have started a sit-in in front of Port Said Prison since last Thursday in preparation for today's ruling.
A number of defendants are on trial for killing 74 people during riots that followed a football match between al-Ahly and al-Masry clubs in Port Said last February.
Chief prosecutor General Talaat Abdallah presented last Monday a memorandum to Port Said Criminal Court to reopen the proceedings of the case in light of new evidence.
Wednesday 23 January 2013
Why Asian fans don't watch live football
By: Saqib Khan
A
brief introduction: I am in my late thirties, was brought up in Ilford
and have supported Liverpool - mainly from my sofa - since the early
'80s because they were the glory team and my immigrant father (from
Pakistan) followed no particular team. I went to watch football matches
the moment I was on my own at university and past the age of being
prevented to travel by a fearful mum, scared by the hooliganism she saw
on TV at the time.
I have been going to Anfield every other season or so since my early twenties. Now I'm settled in Wanstead with my family and am going to be here for the long haul.
When it came to raising my young son, I wanted to have an enduring, shared interest that would give us both time and space to develop a real relationship. It made so much sense to raise him to follow a London team and I made the decision for us to actively support West Ham United (more than I'd ever supported Liverpool) by becoming Academy members. By the time this season is done, I'll have been to eight home games in 12/13.
I think when there are so many Asians and East Europeans on West Ham's doorstep, it would be a mistake not to actively target them with introductory offers in the hope of hooking them into the fold. I've spent in excess of £500 this year already and still have at least two more games to go to, taking into account business travel commitments. As time goes on, that yearly spend will only increase with another child on the way and, quite likely, more frequent attendance in the coming seasons.
The introductory offers that might attract new fans make financial sense and West Ham United, to their credit, are doing more than most Premier League clubs are (other than those in parts of the country where the local economy is really at rock-bottom).
I’ve read how a few people on the KUMB.com Forum wonder and presume why Asians don’t follow West Ham at Upton Park in any great number. Here is my tuppence:
Immigrant parents having a ‘save’ rather than ‘spend’ mentality
Many of the first generation immigrants like my father also sent money back home to support extended families. Leisure spend was - and still is for many - deemed a luxury. Our cultural relationship with money was about building security and not frittering it away on intangibles. My father for example worked near seven-day weeks and apart from going to Pakistan in an emergency when his parents died, went through the 11-year period of 1986-1997 without a holiday. I'm not sure that I, as a born and bred Brit, could now go more than a year without one.
A legacy from a time when Asians often feared feeling out of place or worse - be made to feel unwelcome
Prior to this season, I'd been to 19 football matches in total yet I still googled 'Asians at West Ham' and found this forum thread and read all the posts before feeling comfortable in committing to West Ham United. There was a fear that it might be a dicier club for an Asian to follow than Arsenal or Spurs (Chelsea was NEVER an option).
Asians tend to have more family commitments on a weekly basis
Looking around at most of my married Asian friends, we often meet with both partner’s families every week, that generally takes away one day in the weekend and one night in the week. Taking an afternoon for football puts time with immediate family (wife and kids) even more at a premium. Luckily, my wife sees it as me giving her a chance for a much needed break from looking after our son when I take him with me and he loves it too. If however, she was to feel that we needed to be spending together what's left of the weekend not consumed by extended families as so many of my mate's weekends are, then would be a different story.
No historical tradition of going to the footy
Asians in general have not been taken to the football by their dad or grandad like most of my (white English) university mates were. So those that are going are starting their own traditions that in time, through generations will multiply, but is in generational terms, still in its infancy.
As for West Ham, only those who wish to go regularly are likely to get off the glory-train
As the majority of Asians in the area came in the late '60s, '70s and early '80s, Manchester United and Liverpool have a big stronghold within the community. As their children have grown, they've continued following those teams and their children are doing the same because it doesn’t make a difference where a team is in the country if you only ever watch them on TV. Even those who might go to the odd game once a season don't mind making a once-in-a-blue-moon trip to Anfield or Old Trafford and following them on Sky the rest of the time.
It's those that want to go regularly and are aware of the football and its presence in the greater community and want to really be a part of all that, that are re-thinking their allegiances. I'm more than a little embarrassed now of ever having supported anyone other than my local West Ham who I’m prouder to call my club than I ever was to follow Liverpool remotely. I love the fact that regardless of whether it's Upton Park or Stratford, that taking my kid(s) for a midweek evening game after work will be a normal thing without the crappy hassle of an eight-hour round trip.
A minor point, but still one worth making: no breakout Asian football star yet
Yes, there is the odd person with an Asian connection – only Michael Chopra and Zesh Rehman come to mind; hardly household names. A big star might have the same attention that lead to Irishmen in the '70s supporting Arsenal with Jennings, Brady and O’Leary in the team.
After being born and bred here, I want for me and my family to be rooted and invested in our local community (I'm a member of my local Wanstead Society). Ive set up not just my home but also my new business in Wanstead - employing local people - and supporting our local team is just an extension of that.
I just hope drawing attention to some of the factors above make people understand it's more than a simple yes/no, like/dislike thing about Asians going or wanting to go to watch football.
I understand the sentiment with those fed up at segmenting fans into ethnicities and feel that on match day, we are all simply West Ham fans. However, to those tired of such discussions, please bear with the others as I think there is a genuine desire to try and understand why such a large local demographic might not be engaged with West Ham and what can be done to increase participation - especially when we might have another 20,000 seats to fill in a few years.
Journalists who want to believe it's mainly because of some inherent racial indifference from clubs may be missing the point. The truth is there are quicker wins to be made from Sky and other corporates than the slow, long-term recruitment of new fans with a much longer pay-off of return on investment - and it’s a lack of real insight into the underlying factors of non-attendance of the Asian communities.
My apologies to have gone on so long - but I wanted this to be a considered answer from a fan with an insight (though not the only one) into the Asian community on football.
Please note that the opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, nor should be attributed to
link
I have been going to Anfield every other season or so since my early twenties. Now I'm settled in Wanstead with my family and am going to be here for the long haul.
When it came to raising my young son, I wanted to have an enduring, shared interest that would give us both time and space to develop a real relationship. It made so much sense to raise him to follow a London team and I made the decision for us to actively support West Ham United (more than I'd ever supported Liverpool) by becoming Academy members. By the time this season is done, I'll have been to eight home games in 12/13.
I think when there are so many Asians and East Europeans on West Ham's doorstep, it would be a mistake not to actively target them with introductory offers in the hope of hooking them into the fold. I've spent in excess of £500 this year already and still have at least two more games to go to, taking into account business travel commitments. As time goes on, that yearly spend will only increase with another child on the way and, quite likely, more frequent attendance in the coming seasons.
The introductory offers that might attract new fans make financial sense and West Ham United, to their credit, are doing more than most Premier League clubs are (other than those in parts of the country where the local economy is really at rock-bottom).
I’ve read how a few people on the KUMB.com Forum wonder and presume why Asians don’t follow West Ham at Upton Park in any great number. Here is my tuppence:
Immigrant parents having a ‘save’ rather than ‘spend’ mentality
Many of the first generation immigrants like my father also sent money back home to support extended families. Leisure spend was - and still is for many - deemed a luxury. Our cultural relationship with money was about building security and not frittering it away on intangibles. My father for example worked near seven-day weeks and apart from going to Pakistan in an emergency when his parents died, went through the 11-year period of 1986-1997 without a holiday. I'm not sure that I, as a born and bred Brit, could now go more than a year without one.
A legacy from a time when Asians often feared feeling out of place or worse - be made to feel unwelcome
Prior to this season, I'd been to 19 football matches in total yet I still googled 'Asians at West Ham' and found this forum thread and read all the posts before feeling comfortable in committing to West Ham United. There was a fear that it might be a dicier club for an Asian to follow than Arsenal or Spurs (Chelsea was NEVER an option).
Asians tend to have more family commitments on a weekly basis
Looking around at most of my married Asian friends, we often meet with both partner’s families every week, that generally takes away one day in the weekend and one night in the week. Taking an afternoon for football puts time with immediate family (wife and kids) even more at a premium. Luckily, my wife sees it as me giving her a chance for a much needed break from looking after our son when I take him with me and he loves it too. If however, she was to feel that we needed to be spending together what's left of the weekend not consumed by extended families as so many of my mate's weekends are, then would be a different story.
No historical tradition of going to the footy
Asians in general have not been taken to the football by their dad or grandad like most of my (white English) university mates were. So those that are going are starting their own traditions that in time, through generations will multiply, but is in generational terms, still in its infancy.
As for West Ham, only those who wish to go regularly are likely to get off the glory-train
As the majority of Asians in the area came in the late '60s, '70s and early '80s, Manchester United and Liverpool have a big stronghold within the community. As their children have grown, they've continued following those teams and their children are doing the same because it doesn’t make a difference where a team is in the country if you only ever watch them on TV. Even those who might go to the odd game once a season don't mind making a once-in-a-blue-moon trip to Anfield or Old Trafford and following them on Sky the rest of the time.
It's those that want to go regularly and are aware of the football and its presence in the greater community and want to really be a part of all that, that are re-thinking their allegiances. I'm more than a little embarrassed now of ever having supported anyone other than my local West Ham who I’m prouder to call my club than I ever was to follow Liverpool remotely. I love the fact that regardless of whether it's Upton Park or Stratford, that taking my kid(s) for a midweek evening game after work will be a normal thing without the crappy hassle of an eight-hour round trip.
A minor point, but still one worth making: no breakout Asian football star yet
Yes, there is the odd person with an Asian connection – only Michael Chopra and Zesh Rehman come to mind; hardly household names. A big star might have the same attention that lead to Irishmen in the '70s supporting Arsenal with Jennings, Brady and O’Leary in the team.
After being born and bred here, I want for me and my family to be rooted and invested in our local community (I'm a member of my local Wanstead Society). Ive set up not just my home but also my new business in Wanstead - employing local people - and supporting our local team is just an extension of that.
I just hope drawing attention to some of the factors above make people understand it's more than a simple yes/no, like/dislike thing about Asians going or wanting to go to watch football.
I understand the sentiment with those fed up at segmenting fans into ethnicities and feel that on match day, we are all simply West Ham fans. However, to those tired of such discussions, please bear with the others as I think there is a genuine desire to try and understand why such a large local demographic might not be engaged with West Ham and what can be done to increase participation - especially when we might have another 20,000 seats to fill in a few years.
Journalists who want to believe it's mainly because of some inherent racial indifference from clubs may be missing the point. The truth is there are quicker wins to be made from Sky and other corporates than the slow, long-term recruitment of new fans with a much longer pay-off of return on investment - and it’s a lack of real insight into the underlying factors of non-attendance of the Asian communities.
My apologies to have gone on so long - but I wanted this to be a considered answer from a fan with an insight (though not the only one) into the Asian community on football.
Please note that the opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, nor should be attributed to
link
Saturday 5 January 2013
Three-year ban for hooligan tackled by Joe Hart
A football hooligan who stormed on to the pitch to confront Rio
Ferdinand –- only to be stopped by Shropshire-born England goalkeeper
Joe Hart – has been banned from attending football matches for three
years.link
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)